**Required math: algebra, calculus**

**Required physics: quantum mechanics, angular momentum**

Reference: Griffiths, David J. (2005), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Edition; Pearson Education – Sec. 4.3.2 & Problem 4.21.

We have seen how to calculate the eigenvalues of the angular momentum operators and using only the commutation relations for the three components of . This doesn’t tell us the eigenfunctions, however, so we’ll consider that here. The procedure unfortunately involves a lot of calculation, so we just have to get on with it.

It is easiest to work in spherical coordinates, so we first need to express in spherical coordinates. We have

The radius vector is and the cross product of any vector with itself is zero, so the angular momentum operator becomes

using the cross product relations for the spherical unit vectors and .

We need to extract from this formula the values for the three components of , so we need to convert this equation so that the vectors are the cartesian unit vectors. To do this, we can use the formulas

Plugging these into the equation for and collecting terms, we get

The raising and lowering operators can be worked out from these formulas, and we get

We now have all the bits we need to calculate . We use the formula

We work out the first term by applying the two operators to a test function :

Subscripts on the test function represent derivatives with respect to the subscripted variable. Using the trig identity , we get the required result after removing the test function:

We now work out :

using the trig identity to simplify the second derivative term in .

The eigenfunction must satisfy

The eigenfunction equation for is

This equation is equivalent to

since they both have the solution , where is some function of (the precise function doesn’t matter since it cancels out on the left hand side).

Looking back at the solution to the angular part of the Schrödinger equation in three dimensions, we see that these differential equations are the same as the ones we encountered there when we used separation of variables. The solutions there were the spherical harmonics, so we see that the eigenfunctions of are in fact spherical harmonics.

One final comment is worth making. When we worked out the eigenvalues of we saw that they had the form where could be any non-negative integer or half-integer. In the solution of the differential equations that give rise to the spherical harmonics, however, only integer values of are allowed. You might think that these extra values of are not physically significant, but when we come to study spin, we see that since the eigenstates of spin have no relation to spatial coordinates so that spherical harmonics are not involved, there is no reason to discard the half-integer values. In fact they turn out to be fundamental, since half-integer spins are common amongst the elementary particles (such as protons, neutrons and electrons).

Pingback: Spherical harmonic at the top of the ladder « Physics tutorials

Pingback: Spherical harmonic using the raising operator « Physics tutorials

Angular momentum – raising and lowering operators « Physics tutorials[…] can use the raising operator to find from this. In spherical coordinates, the raising operator […]

Pingback: Rigid rotor in quantum mechanics « Physics tutorials

Pingback: Spherical harmonics: normalization « Physics tutorials

Pingback: Angular momentum as a generator of rotations « Physics tutorials

Pingback: Fine structure of hydrogen: spin-orbit coupling | Physics pages

Pingback: Selection rules for spontaneous emission of radiation | Physics pages

Pingback: Angular momentum: restriction to integer values | Physics pages

DamianHi, thz you for the detailed explanation it was usefull in understand the derivation.

I have 2 things I didn’t understand.

– First i think you did a small typo on equation 13 you have an i sin theta term while you mean a isin phi term because after you collapse them in euler form.

-Second from equation 12 to 13 how did you first -sin phi become cos phi

DamianThinking more about it I think some more(using x= phi) u had -ih(-sinx +_ i cosx)

then h(+_ cos x + isinx) = h(+_ (cosx +_ isinx). Is that right?

Also ive never seen this why does (+_a+b) = +_(a+_b) ?

gwrowePost authorFixed the typo in equation 13.

As for , think of the as , so that . Then