**Required math: calculus **

**Required physics: **Schrödinger equation

References: Griffiths, David J. (2005), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Edition; Pearson Education – Problem 2.39.

Styer, Daniel F. (2000), Quantum revivals versus classical periodicity in the infinite square well. (Online paper).

Suppose a particle is in an infinite square well in the interval . We’re not specifying which state it’s in, so in general, its wave function is

where the coefficients would be determined in the usual way by looking at .

Any wave function in the infinite square well has what is known as a *revival time*, which is a time after which the wave function returns to its initial state. We can find this time by looking at the time-dependent term above.

In order for this to be equal to , we must have

The first for which this is true is found from

The infinite square well energies are

so

We want a value of which will result in a return to the initial state for *all* energies, so we need to pick the longest time, which occurs at . This value of is a multiple of all the times calculated using higher values of , so the argument of the complex exponential will be a multiple of for all these times, ensuring a return to the initial state. Thus the revival time is

Classically, a particle in an infinite square well bounces back and forth between the walls. If its energy is , its velocity is and the classical revival time is the time taken to traverse the well twice:

This is equal to the quantum time if

Since this is smaller than the ground state energy in the quantum system, this energy cannot be realized in the quantum system.

In fact, there seems to be a greater problem than this: the classical revival time depends on the energy, while the quantum time does not; it depends only on the particle’s mass and the width of the well. In Styer’s paper (reference at the top), he argues that the full wave function is not measurable, so what we should be looking at are measurable quantities, such as the expectation value of position . He shows that for a particle made up of a superposition of stationary states centred at quantum number , the period of is

Given that the quantum energy of state is , we can write this as

Using we get

That is, the revival time for the position in the quantum case *is* equal to the classical revival time.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Pingback: PChem Is Pfun! » Blog Archive » Quantum Revival