Reference: Moore, Thomas A., *A General Relativity Workbook*, University Science Books (2013) – Chapter 9; Box 9.1; Problem 9.4.

It’s time to have a look at a proper general relativistic metric and apply some of the theory we’ve done up to now. To do this properly, we really should derive the Einstein equation for gravitation, but that would require a lot more discussion of tensor calculus. We can actually specify a *solution* to the Einstein equation in the form of a metric for curved space-time and leave the proof that this metric is a solution until later, when we’ve done a lot more theory.

The metric we’ll look at was discovered by Karl Schwarzschild in 1916, very soon after Einstein developed general relativity. It describes space-time in a vacuum outside a spherically symmetric mass. The metric is

The parameter is known as the *Schwarzschild radius* and will turn out to depend on the mass of the object.

This metric bears a superficial resemblance to the ordinary spherical metric in flat space, which is

We need to be careful in drawing any parallels between the two metrics, however, since the coordinates and don’t have the same meaning in the two cases. To illustrate this, we’ll have a look at the radial coordinate.

Suppose we look at the set of points (events) where , and are all constant, and take . This specifies the equator on a sphere. In that case

and if we integrate this around the complete circle (for from 0 to ), we get, not surprisingly . If we define this distance as the circumference then

This is hardly an earth-shattering revelation, but now for the sting in the tail. In flat 3-d space, the distance is the radius of the circle with circumference . In the Schwarzschild metric, this is *not* the case.

To see this, suppose we now consider a path where and varies between and . From the metric, the path length is

Integrating this using software we get

where is a constant of integration.

The logarithm can be converted to an inverse hyperbolic tangent. We start with the identity

If we try we get

When we evaluate this between two limits, the last term cancels out, so the path length between and is

For , this reduces to , which is what we’d expect for flat space. However, if , this expression is clearly not just the difference in radial coordinates.

For , we can expand this result in a series (again, using software). We get

Assuming , these first 3 terms are all positive (in fact, all the terms up to are positive), so the path length . This means that if we take two equatorial circles with one at and the second at , then the circumferences of these two circles are and , but the radial distance between the circles is *greater than* . This is one of the curious effects of using curved space-time.

For this reason, the Schwarzschild radial coordinate is a *circumferential radial coordinate*, that is, if we integrate around a full circle at radius , we get a circumference of , but if we measure the distance outwards from to , we don’t get .

If we apply this to the Earth, we can find how much the Schwarzschild radial coordinate differs from the Euclidean radius. If we start at the Earth’s surface where and move radially outward by 100 km to , then using for the Earth, the first order in deviation term above is

which is under a tenth of a millimetre. Although small, this is far from an unmeasurable deviation.

ImanHi.

Thanks for great posts on metric tensor and great examples.I follow them very carefully.the math is fine.I know much of it and have done some examples myself.but my problem is with the intuition behind it.to be precise I have the following problems:(sorry Im fastforwarding subjects!)

1:exactly what does general relativity gives us?we know it gives us a metric consisting of coordinates(x,y,z) and also time(t) but what is it?is this simply a formulation to find the “equations of motion”?we find the metric then we find its geodesics and the geodesics are the paths our particle traces?

2:The Chrisstofel symbols and Curvature Tensor:how can we reach it intuitively?and calculate the curvature without the complicated formalism of chrisstofel symbols?intuitivley.

Pingback: Spherical metric: distance in 2-d curved space | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Schwarzschild radius | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Schwarzschild metric: time coordinate | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Particle orbits – conserved quantities | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Orbit of a comet around a black hole | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Photon equations of motion | Physics tutorials

Pingback: Event horizon: distance from external radius up to r = 2GM | Physics pages

Pingback: Event horizon: proper time to fall into r = 0 | Physics pages

Pingback: Event horizon: time and space swap round | Physics pages

Pingback: Painlevé-Gullstrand (global rain) coordinates | Physics pages

Pingback: Christoffel symbols for Schwarzschild metric | Physics pages

Pingback: Particle orbits – conserved quantities | Physics pages

Pingback: Einstein equation solution for the interior of a spherically symmetric star | Physics pages

Pingback: Cosmic strings | Physics pages

Pingback: simple integral | Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community