Reference: Daniel V. Schroeder, *An Introduction to Thermal Physics*, (Addison-Wesley, 2000) – Problems 1.23 – 1.25.

Each translational degree of freedom in a molecule has an associated average kinetic energy of , so for the molecules in a gas the total kinetic energy due to translational motion is . It turns out that, in general, any energy component with a quadratic dependence on its associated position or velocity contributes to the total thermal energy. This includes rotational degrees of freedom, since the energy is , where is the moment of inertia about axis and is the angular velocity about that same axis. Chemical bonds also act approximately like springs, so two bonded atoms can vibrate relative to each other, giving rise to another kinetic energy term and a potential energy term given by where is the spring constant and is the molecular separation.

The total number of degrees of freedom for a given molecule can be tricky to calculate for more complex molecules, but once is found, the *equipartition theorem* says that the thermal energy of a collection of molecules is

Example 1A monatomic gas such as helium is the simplest case, as it has only the three translational degrees of freedom, so for a collection of atomsA litre () of helium at (room temperature) and a pressure of has a thermal energy of

For air, if we neglect argon (which accounts for about 1% of air), all the molecules are diatomic ( and ). At room temperature, the vibrational modes don’t contribute, since these diatomic molecules have to be hit very hard to get a vibration going, so the only extra degrees of freedom are the two rotational degrees of freedom that we get by rotating a dumbbell shape about the two axes that are perpendicular to the bond joining the two atoms. (A rotation about the axis of the bond isn’t counted as such a rotation doesn’t change the position of the molecule.) So in this case and we have

Example 2In an elemental solid such as lead, each atom has 6 vibrational degrees of freedom (3 kinetic and 3 potential, as described above). Since the atoms are fixed in their positions in the lattice, there are no translational degrees of freedom, and there are no rotational degrees of freedom for a single atom. For 1 gram of lead, we haveThe thermal energy at is

Example 3In a water molecule, the two hydrogen atoms are not in a straight line with the oxygen atom, so water has 3 rotational degrees of freedom in addition to the 3 translational degrees of freedom. [A linear molecule such as carbon dioxide has only 2 rotational degrees of freedom since the rotation about the O-C-O axis doesn’t count.] Each O-H bond can vibrate like a spring, so that would add 4 more degrees of freedom. The total number is therefore . [Actually, come to think of it, there could be other vibrational modes as well. The H-O-H angle could change without the length of either H-O bond changing, so there’s probably another vibrational mode there. However, that’s not really a spring-type vibration, so I’m not sure if it counts in the equipartition theorem.]

Pingback: PV diagrams: a monatomic ideal gas follows a triangular cycle | Physics pages

Pingback: PV diagrams: a diatomic ideal gas undergoes a rectangular cycle | Physics pages

Pingback: Isothermal and adiabatic compression of an ideal gas | Physics pages

Pingback: Isothermal versus adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas bubble | Physics pages

Pingback: Heat capacity of a single water molecule | Physics pages

Pingback: Heat capacities at constant volume and pressure | Physics pages

Pingback: Negative heat capacity in gravitational systems; estimate the Sun’s temperature | Physics pages

Pingback: Temperature of an Einstein solid | Physics pages

Pingback: Energy of a system with quadratic degrees of freedom | Physics pages

Pingback: Entropy of a star | Physics pages

AkainozomuExample 2:

There are 2 major concerns that I would like to raise:

1) The translational degree of freedom should be neglected, as a highly idealized solid should only possess vibrational degree of freedom (totaling f=6).

2) Plugging in the numbers you have provided, 2.61 J is not correct.

Should be roughly 54 J for f=9, and 36 J for f=6.

Please let me know about your thoughts on this. Also great job on making work for this book!

gwrowePost authorFixed now. Thanks.

Pingback: Thermodynamic properties of a 2-dim ideal gas | Physics pages

Pingback: Internal combustion engine; the Otto cycle | Physics pages

Pingback: Stirling engine | Physics pages

Pingback: Entropy of water and steam | Physics pages

Pingback: Laser cooling | Physics pages

Pingback: Wet adiabatic lapse rate | Physics pages